Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39967472›Full record

ReviewJournal of mass spectrometry : JMS2025

Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics in Clinical Diagnosis of Amyloidosis and Multiple Myeloma: A Review (2012-2024).

Katerina Kratka, Pavel Sistik, Ivana Olivkova, Pavlina Kusnierova, Zdenek Svagera, David Stejskal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katerina KratkaInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0422-0068
Pavel SistikInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3347-9540
Ivana OlivkovaInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Pavlina KusnierovaInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Zdenek SvageraInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
David StejskalInstitute of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.

Funding

LERCO CZ.10.03.01/00/22_003/0000003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteomics is nowadays increasingly becoming part of the routine clinical practice of diagnostic laboratories, especially due to the advent of advanced mass spectrometry techniques. This review focuses on the application of proteomic analysis in the identification of pathological conditions in a hospital setting, with a particular focus on the analysis of protein biomarkers. In particular, the main purpose of the review is to highlight the challenges associated with the identification of specific disease-causing proteins, given their complex nature and the variety of posttranslational modifications (PTMs) they can undergo. PTMs, such as phosphorylation and glycosylation, play critical roles in protein function but can also lead to diseases if dysregulated. Proteomics plays an important role especially in various medical fields ranging from cardiology, internal medicine to hemato-oncology emphasizing the interdisciplinary nature of this field. Traditional methods such as electrophoretic or immunochemical methods have been mainstay in protein detection; however, these techniques are limited in terms of specificity and sensitivity. Examples include the diagnosis of multiple myeloma and the detection of its specific protein or amyloidosis, which relies heavily on these conventional methods, which sometimes lead to false positives or inadequate disease monitoring. Mass spectrometry in this respect emerges as a superior alternative, providing high sensitivity and specificity in the detection and quantification of specific protein sequences. This technique is particularly beneficial for monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD) in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma where traditional methods fall short. Furthermore mass spectrometry can provide precise typing of amyloid proteins, which is crucial for the appropriate treatment of amyloidosis. This review summarizes the opportunities for proteomic determination using mass spectrometry between 2012 and 2024, highlighting the transformative potential of mass spectrometry in clinical proteomics and encouraging its wider use in diagnostic laboratories.

Indexed as

AmyloidosisMass SpectrometryMultiple MyelomaProteomicsBiomarkersHumansProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalBiomarkersamyloidosisliquid chromatographymass spectrometrymultiple myelomaproteomics

Identifiers

PMID39967472
PMCPMC11836596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.