Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39967291›Full record

ArticleMolecular microbiology2025

NrdR in Streptococcus and Listeria spp.: DNA Helix Phase Dependence of the Bacterial Ribonucleotide Reductase Repressor.

Saher Shahid, Mateusz Balka, Daniel Lundin, Daniel O Daley, Britt-Marie Sjöberg, Inna Rozman Grinberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saher ShahidDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mateusz BalkaDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Daniel LundinDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Daniel O DaleyDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Britt-Marie SjöbergDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Inna Rozman GrinbergDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3094-1998

Funding

Cancerfonden 20 1210 PjFCarl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning CTS 20:361Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning CTS 21:1637Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF21OC0071844Vetenskapsrådet 2019-01400Wenner-Gren Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NrdR is a universal transcriptional repressor of bacterial genes coding for ribonucleotide reductases (RNRs), essential enzymes that provide DNA building blocks in all living cells. Despite its bacterial prevalence, the NrdR mechanism has been scarcely studied. We report the biochemical, biophysical, and bioinformatical characterization of NrdR and its binding sites from two major bacterial pathogens of the phylum Bacillota Listeria monocytogenes and Streptococcus pneumoniae. NrdR consists of a Zn-ribbon domain followed by an ATP-cone domain. We show that it forms tetramers that bind to DNA when loaded with ATP and dATP, but if loaded with only ATP, NrdR forms various oligomeric complexes unable to bind DNA. The DNA-binding site in L. monocytogenes is a pair of NrdR boxes separated by 15-16 bp, whereas in S. pneumoniae, the NrdR boxes are separated by unusually long spacers of 25-26 bp. This observation triggered a comprehensive binding study of four NrdRs from L. monocytogenes, S. pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Streptomyces coelicolor to a series of dsDNA fragments where the NrdR boxes were separated by 12-27 bp. The in vitro results were confirmed in vivo in E. coli and revealed that NrdR binds most efficiently when there is an integer number of DNA turns between the center of the two NrdR boxes. The study facilitates the prediction of NrdR binding sites in bacterial genomes and suggests that the NrdR mechanism is conserved throughout the bacterial domain. It sheds light on RNR regulation in Listeria and Streptococcus, and since NrdR does not occur in eukaryotes, opens a way to the development of novel antibiotics.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsListeriaListeria monocytogenesRepressor ProteinsRibonucleotide ReductasesStreptococcusStreptococcus pneumoniaeAdenosine TriphosphateBinding SitesDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coliGene Expression Regulation, BacterialProtein BindingAdenosine TriphosphateBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsRepressor ProteinsRibonucleotide Reductasesallosteric regulationATP‐conegene expressionribonucleotide reductasetranscription factor

Identifiers

PMID39967291
PMCPMC12051234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.