Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39967282›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025

Obesity and cesarean section rate among low-risk primiparous women in Victoria, Australia: A population-based study.

Alemayehu Mekonnen, Glyn Teale, Vidanka Vasilevski, Linda Sweet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alemayehu MekonnenSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6826-4817
Glyn TealeWomen's and Children's Services, Western Health, St Albans, Victoria, Australia.
Vidanka VasilevskiSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
Linda SweetSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWomen living with overweight, or obesity are at risk of pregnancy and birth complications. This study investigated the trend and associations between overweight and obesity on cesarean births and their contribution to cesarean births among low-risk primiparous women in Australia. MATERIAL AND

methodsBody mass index data were obtained for 219, 950 primipara (aged 20─34 years) with singleton, term pregnancies without malpresentations from the Victorian Perinatal Data Collection registry (2010─2019). Women were grouped according to body mass index and logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the trend and associations of overweight and obesity with cesarean births. The contribution of overweight and obesity to cesarean births were estimated using population attributable fraction.

resultsThe prevalence of cesarean birth was 29.7%, and the prevalence increased by 20%, from 27.6% in 2010 to 33.2% in 2019. Being overweight or obese was independently associated with an increased likelihood of cesarean births in the overall sample (adjusted OR (AOR) 1.46; 95% CI 1.42-1.50 and AOR 2.05, 95% CI 1.98-2.11, respectively). However, overweight was not an independent risk factor when the analysis was limited to elective cesarean births. Induction of labor was significantly higher among women who were overweight (AOR 1.38; 95% CI 1.35-2.42), or obese (AOR 2.18 95% CI 2.12-2.25). The combined overweight and obesity contributed to 14.8% of cesarean births but the increasing trend of cesarean births was not explained solely by changes in overweight or obesity rates.

conclusionsObesity and overweight, combined, are responsible for a significant proportion of cesarean births. However, overweight and obesity alone do not provide enough insight into the increasing trend of cesarean birth. While further investigation of potential contributors is needed, initiatives to reduce cesarean births in Australia may benefit better by including measures, such as health education to prevent overweight and obesity prior to conception.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionObesityPregnancy ComplicationsAdultBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansOverweightParityPregnancyPrevalenceRisk FactorsVictoriaYoung AdultCesarean sectionhigh‐income countrieslow‐risk pregnancyobesityoverweight

Identifiers

PMID39967282
PMCPMC11919740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.