ArticleThoracic cancer2025
RETRACTION: Manganese-12 Acetate Suppresses the Migration, Invasion, and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition by Inhibiting Wnt/β-Catenin and PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathways in Breast Cancer Cells.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
retractionH. Ju, Y. Li, X. Xing, X. Miao, Y. Feng, Y. Ren, J. Qin, D. Liu, Z. Chen, and Z. Yang, "Manganese-12 Acetate Suppresses the Migration, Invasion, and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition by Inhibiting Wnt/β-Catenin and PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathways in Breast Cancer Cells," Thoracic Cancer 9, no. 3 (2018): 353-359, https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12584. The above article, published online on 08 January 2018 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the authors; the journal Editor-in-Chief, Tateaki Naito; and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. The retraction has been agreed upon following an investigation into concerns raised by a third party which revealed inappropriate image panel duplications between this (Figure 1a and b) and three other articles from the same institute published in a different scientific context. The authors admitted to the image compilation error and stated that during the experimental work, the author groups shared a laboratory which could have led to the error in reusing the images. Due to the number of errors identified in the published figures, the authors and the editors have lost confidence in the presented data and consider the conclusions substantially compromised.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.