Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39967204›Full record

ArticleJACC. CardioOncology2025

SGLT2i Therapy Prevents Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity in a Large Animal Model by Preserving Myocardial Energetics.

Danielle Medina-Hernández, Laura Cádiz, Annalaura Mastrangelo, Andrea Moreno-Arciniegas, Miguel Fernández Tocino, Alejandro A Cueto Becerra, Anabel Díaz-Guerra Priego, Warren A Skoza, María Isabel Higuero-Verdejo, Gonzalo Javier López-Martín and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. CardioOncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diabetes and cancer: therapeutic implications.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity: A Comprehensive Update.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Danielle Medina-HernándezFundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Laura CádizFundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Annalaura MastrangeloFundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Andrea Moreno-ArciniegasFundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel Fernández TocinoFundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Alejandro A Cueto BecerraFundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Anabel Díaz-Guerra PriegoFundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Warren A SkozaFundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
María Isabel Higuero-VerdejoFundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Gonzalo Javier López-MartínFundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Claudia Pérez-MartínezFacultad de Veterinaria. León University, León, Spain.
Antonio de Molina-IrachetaFundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
María Caballero-ValderramaHospital Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.
Javier Sánchez-GonzálezPhilips, Madrid, Spain.
David SanchoFundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Valentin FusterFundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Carlos Galán-ArriolaFundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: carlos.galan@cnic.es.
Borja IbáñezFundación Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares, Madrid, Spain; Cardiology Department, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz Hospital, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: bibanez@cnic.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity (AIC) is characterized by a disruption in myocardial metabolism.

objectivesThe authors used a large animal model to test sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitor therapy to prevent AIC.

methodsFemale large white pigs (n = 36) were used to identify the most translational AIC regimen: 6 triweekly intravenous doxorubicin injections (1.8 mg/kg each). Another group of 32 pigs were randomized (1:1:2) to doxorubicin plus empagliflozin 20 mg, doxorubicin plus empagliflozin 10 mg, or doxorubicin control. Pigs were serially examined using multiparametric cardiac magnetic resonance and magnetic resonance spectroscopy. At the end of the 21-week follow-up period, blood samples were obtained to measure myocardial metabolic substrate extraction, and the left ventricle was harvested and processed for analysis using metabolomics, transmission electron microscopy, mitochondrial respirometry, and histopathology.

resultsFinal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the prespecified primary outcome, was significantly higher in pigs receiving 20 mg empagliflozin than in the doxorubicin control group (median 57.5% [Q1-Q3: 55.5%-60.3%] vs 47.0% [Q1-Q3: 40.8%-47.8%]; P = 0.027). Final LVEF in pigs receiving 10 mg empagliflozin was 51% (Q1-Q3: 46.5%-55.5%; P = 0.020 vs 20 mg empagliflozin). The incidence of AIC events was 0%, 50%, and 72% in the empagliflozin 20 mg, empagliflozin 10 mg, and doxorubicin control groups, respectively. Empagliflozin 20 mg treatment resulted in enhanced ketone body consumption by the myocardium, preserved magnetic resonance spectroscopy-measured cardiac energetics, and improved mitochondrial structure and function on transmission electron microscopy and respirometry. These changes were more modest with the 10-mg empagliflozin dose.

conclusionsSodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor therapy with empagliflozin exerts a dose-dependent cardioprotective effect against AIC. The improved LVEF was accompanied by enhanced ketone body consumption, improved cardiac energetics, and preserved mitochondrial structure and function.

Indexed as

anthracyclinecardiomyopathycardio-oncologycardioprotectiondoxorubicin cardiotoxicityheart failureimagingketosismetabolismmyocardial energeticspigssodium glucose contransporter-2 inhibitorstreatment

Identifiers

PMID39967204
PMCPMC11866421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.