Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39966995›Full record

ArticleTransplantation2025

Mucosal Mixed Lymphocyte Reaction Assay Using Intestinal Lymphocytes as a Biomarker for Intestinal Transplant Tolerance Development.

M Esad Gunes, Satyajit Patwardhan, Julie Hong, Elin Manell, Philip Jordache, Ishit Chauhan, Ahmed Almesallmy, Jianing Fu, Megan Sykes, Joshua Weiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

M Esad GunesColumbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Satyajit PatwardhanColumbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Julie HongColumbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Elin ManellColumbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Philip JordacheColumbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Ishit ChauhanColumbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Ahmed AlmesallmyColumbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Jianing FuColumbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Megan SykesColumbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Joshua WeinerColumbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY.

Funding

Intestinal allograft tolerance in large animalsR01AI138547 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SYKES, MEGAN, YAMADA, KAZUHIKO · 2018 to 2022
$3.9M
Defining the relationship between host-microbiome interactions and rejection after intestinal transplantationK23AI156026 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WEINER, JOSHUA · 2021 to 2025
$962k
Five-laser Aurora spectral flow cytometerS10OD030282 · OD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CREUSOT, REMI J · 2022 to 2022
$361k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI156026NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI138547NIH HHS S10 OD030282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntestinal transplantation (ITx) has the highest rate of rejection among solid organ grafts. We aimed to study the pathophysiology of rejection after ITx but lacked a tool for assessing cellular responses within the graft. Therefore, we developed a novel mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assay to investigate immune responses in the graft.

methodsIntestinal samples were collected, decontaminated, and processed into single-cell suspensions from 9 swine and 2 patients that underwent ITx. Debris was removed using gradient centrifugation. The cells were plated with corresponding stimulator cells and incubated for 6 d before data acquisition and analysis.

resultsTolerant animals showed no anti-donor or anti-recipient responses in their graft mucosa but maintained strong anti-third-party responses, even after weaning immunosuppression. An animal with graft-versus-host disease displayed robust anti-recipient and anti-third-party responses but no anti-donor response. The animals with graft rejection maintained anti-donor responses at all timepoints. Finally, some tolerant animals developed "split tolerance," with anti-donor responses in the peripheral blood but donor-specific hyporesponsiveness in the mucosal MLR, which regulatory T cells depletion suggested was attributable to local regulatory tolerance. When applied to human sample, this mucosal MLR reliably demonstrated self-tolerance with normal anti-third-party responsiveness.

conclusionsThe novel mucosal MLR assay presented herein ± CD25 depletion serves as a useful adjunct for assessing immune responses within the intestinal graft mucosa. This could help elucidate immune responses after ITx in future studies, including our own, and could represent a promising tool for studying ITx tolerance development, guiding immunosuppression strategies, and advancing personalized transplant medicine.

Indexed as

Graft RejectionImmunity, MucosalIntestinal MucosaIntestinesLymphocytesOrgan TransplantationTransplantation ToleranceAnimalsBiomarkersFemaleGraft SurvivalGraft vs Host DiseaseHumansLymphocyte Culture Test, MixedMalePredictive Value of TestsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID39966995
PMCPMC12187553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.