Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39966980›Full record

ReviewCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2025

Navigating advanced renal cell carcinoma in the era of artificial intelligence.

Elie J Najem, Mohd Javed S Shaikh, Atul B Shinagare, Katherine M Krajewski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. miR395e fromGenes · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elie J NajemDepartment of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. elie_najem@dfci.harvard.edu.
Mohd Javed S ShaikhDepartment of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Atul B ShinagareDepartment of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Katherine M KrajewskiDepartment of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch has helped to better understand renal cell carcinoma and enhance management of patients with locally advanced and metastatic disease. More recently, artificial intelligence has emerged as a powerful tool in cancer research, particularly in oncologic imaging. BODY: Despite promising results of artificial intelligence in renal cell carcinoma research, most investigations have focused on localized disease, while relatively fewer studies have targeted advanced and metastatic disease. This paper summarizes major artificial intelligence advances focusing mostly on their potential clinical value from initial staging and identification of high-risk features to predicting response to treatment in advanced renal cell carcinoma, while addressing major limitations in the development of some models and highlighting new avenues for future research.

conclusionArtificial intelligence-enabled models have a great potential in improving clinical practice in the diagnosis and management of advanced renal cell carcinoma, particularly when developed from both clinicopathologic and radiologic data.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCarcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm Staging

Identifiers

PMID39966980
PMCPMC11837394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.