ArticleClinical epigenetics2025
Diagnostic utility of single-locus DNA methylation mark in Sotos syndrome developed by nanopore sequencing-based episignature.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn various neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), sets of differential methylation marks (referred to as DNA methylation signatures or episignatures) are syndrome-specific and useful in evaluating the pathogenicity of detected genetic variants. These signatures have generally been tested using methylation arrays, requiring additional experimental and evaluation costs. As an alternative, long-read sequencing can simultaneously and accurately evaluate genetic and epigenetic changes. In addition, genome-wide DNA methylation profiling with more complete sets of CpG using long-read sequencing (than methylation arrays) may provide alternative but more comprehensive DNA methylation signatures, which have yet to be adequately investigated.
methodsNine and seven cases of molecularly diagnosed Sotos syndrome and ATR-X syndrome, respectively, were sequenced using nanopore long-read sequencing, together with 22 controls. Genome-wide differential DNA methylation analysis was performed. Among these differential DNA methylation sites, a single-locus DNA methylation mark at part of the NSD1 CpG island (CpGi) was subsequently studied in an additional 22 cases with a NSD1 point mutation or a 5q35 submicroscopic deletion involving NSD1. To investigate the potential utility of a single-locus DNA methylation test at NSD1 CpGi for differential diagnosis, nine cases with NSD1-negative clinically overlapping overgrowth intellectual disability syndromes (OGIDs) were also tested.
resultsLong-read sequencing enabled the successful extraction of two sets of differential methylation marks unique to each of Sotos syndrome and ATR-X syndrome, referred to as long-read-based DNA methylation signatures (LR-DNAm signatures), as alternatives to reported DNA methylation signatures (obtained by methylation array). Additionally, we found that a part, but not all, of the NSD1 CpGi were hypomethylated compared with the level in controls in both cases harboring NSD1 point mutations and those with a 5q35 submicroscopic deletion. This difference in methylation is specific to Sotos syndrome and lacking in other OGIDs.
conclusionsSimultaneous evaluation of genetic and epigenetic alterations using long-read sequencing may improve the discovery of DNA methylation signatures, which may in turn increase the diagnostic yields. As an example of the outcomes of these analyses, we propose that a single-locus DNA methylation test at NSD1 CpGi may streamline the molecular diagnosis of Sotos syndrome, regardless of the type of NSD1 aberration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.