ArticleTrials2025
6-mm vs 10-mm diameter fully covered self-expandable metal stents in patients with unresectable malignant distal bile duct stricture (COSMIC UNISON): study protocol for a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Groove area involvement predicts post-ERCP pancreatitis after 8-mm fully-covered metal stent placement in resectable pancreatic cancer.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Comparative study on the application of fully covered self-expanding metal stents in benign and malignant strictures of the distal bile duct.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnresectable malignant bile duct stricture (often caused by unresectable pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma) can be drained via insertion of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Because recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) and complications following stent insertion can delay chemotherapy and other treatments, a longer time to RBO (TRBO) is desirable. Although a longer TRBO has been reported among patients who undergo insertion with larger diameter SEMS, patients who undergo insertion with smaller diameter fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) may have a lower incidence of complications than those with larger diameter FCSEMS. The aim of this study is to determine the TRBO and incidence of complications with 6-mm FCSEMS vs 10-mm FCSEMS in patients with unresectable malignant distal bile duct stricture.
methodsIn this multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial (COSMIC UNISON), a target of 250 patients over 23 locations in Japan will receive either the 6-mm FCSEM or the standard 10-mm FCSEM during ERCP, with 125 patients in each group. The observation period will be 24 months, and patients will be enrolled from 15 March 2024 and assessed until the date of RBO or the study end (31 March 2029). The primary endpoint is TRBO, with RBO defined as the coexistence of abnormal liver enzyme values and dilation of the common bile duct and intrahepatic bile duct upstream of the stent. The secondary endpoints are the incidence and rates (at 3, 6, and 12 months) of non-RBO events, overall survival, cause of RBO, and symptomatic stent deviation. Adverse events from endoscopic procedures will be classified by the Lexicon Classification from the American Society of Endoscopy, and all other adverse events will be classified per the Japanese translation of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. DISCUSSION: The COSMIC UNISON study is anticipated to provide evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of 6-mm vs 10-mm FCSEMS to inform the use of 6-mm FCSEMS for the treatment of unresectable malignant distal bile duct stricture.
trial registrationJapan Registry of Clinical Trials identifier: jRCT1042230170. Prospectively registered on 15 March 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.