Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39966930›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Redeployment and changes in working patterns of healthcare workers during COVID-19 in the UK: a qualitative study.

Zainab Zuzer Lal, Mayuri Gogoi, Irtiza Qureshi, Amani Al-Oraibi, Jonathan Chaloner, Padmasayee Papineni, Susie Lagrata, Laura B Nellums, Christopher A Martin, Katherine Woolf and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zainab Zuzer LalDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, UK.
Mayuri GogoiDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, UK.
Irtiza QureshiDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, UK.
Amani Al-OraibiDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, UK.
Jonathan ChalonerDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, UK.
Padmasayee PapineniEaling Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Southall, UK.
Susie LagrataUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Laura B NellumsLifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Christopher A MartinDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, UK.
Katherine WoolfUniversity College London Medical School, London, UK.
Manish PareekDepartment of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, UK. manish.pareek@leicester.ac.uk.
UK-REACH Study Collaborative Group

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V027549/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRedeployment was critical in addressing the increased demands of COVID-19 on the healthcare system. Previous research indicates that ethnic minority healthcare workers (HCWs), those on visas, and in junior roles, were more likely to be redeployed to COVID-19 duties compared to White UK-born HCWs. There is limited evidence on how redeployment was practically organized, preparedness of HCWs and the NHS for rapid changes, and the decision-making processes involved. This paper discusses HCWs' redeployment experiences, their alignment with NHS policy for deploying staff safely, and potential links to staff attrition.

methodsAs part of the United Kingdom Research study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 outcomes among Healthcare workers, we conducted a qualitative sub-study, between December 2020 and July 2021, consisting of interviews and focus groups with 164 HCWs from different ethnicities, genders, job roles, migration statuses, and UK regions. Sessions were conducted online or by telephone, recorded, transcribed and analysed with participants' consent. We utilised the breadth-and-depth approach, initially identifying transcripts mentioning redeployment or changes in work patterns, followed by an in-depth thematic analysis.

resultsOf the 164 HCWs, 22 (13.4%) reported redeployment to a new role, while 42 (26.8%) reported changes in their working patterns. Redeployment experiences varied based on HCWs' workplaces, skillsets, input into decisions, and perceived risks. Four themes were identified: 1. redeployment and the changing nature of work, 2. pandemic (un)preparedness, 3. redeployment decision-making, and 4. risk assessments in the context of redeployment. Our data revealed the practical realities of redeployment, including discrepancies between the NHS policy and actual practices, particularly early deployment without adequate training and supervision. The lack of planning and preparedness had an operational and emotional impact on HCWs, affecting their morale. Lastly, some HCWs felt disempowered and undervalued due to a lack of agency in redeployment decisions.

conclusionThis study highlights HCWs' redeployment experiences during COVID-19, the conditions under which it occurred, and its impacts. The findings, although rooted in the pandemic, remain relevant for addressing staffing challenges in the healthcare workforce. We recommend future redeployment strategies prioritise HCWs' training and supervision, ensure strategic planning with clear communication and support for all staff, foster a sense of value among HCWs, and integrate an intersectional equity lens into workforce planning to improve staff retention and morale.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PersonnelHealth WorkforcePersonnel Staffing and SchedulingAdolescentAdultEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedMinority GroupsPandemicsQualitative ResearchCOVID-19EthnicityHealthcareNHSRedeploymentSpeaking upStaffingStaff retention

Identifiers

PMID39966930
PMCPMC11834651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.