Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39966924›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Healthcare organizations in crisis context: decision-making models and roles of CEOs.

Anna Romiti, Mario Del Vecchio, Caterina Cavicchi, Emidia Vagnoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna RomitiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 48 Viale Morgagni, 50134, Florence, Italy. anna.romiti@unifi.it.
Mario Del VecchioDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 48 Viale Morgagni, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Caterina CavicchiDepartment of Economics and Management, University of Ferrara, 11 Via Voltapaletto, 44121, Ferrara, Italy.
Emidia VagnoniDepartment of Economics and Management, University of Ferrara, 11 Via Voltapaletto, 44121, Ferrara, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn times of crisis, decision-making can become a highly complex process that is shaped differently than in ordinary contexts. The literature presents different decision-making models that have not yet been thoroughly tested in practice. This paper aims to enhance our understanding of the distinctive characteristics of healthcare organizations' decision-making models in crisis contexts, building upon and expanding the framework proposed by Arendt et al. (2005).

methodsBased on a qualitative research design, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 49 CEOs of Italian healthcare organizations, including both local health authorities and independent hospitals.

resultsCEOs' decision-making processes demonstrated several commonalities: a shift from strategic issues to operational issues; a narrowed CEO focus on only a few areas of operations, and a significant concentration of the DMP in time and space. These shared elements provide insights into the nature of the centralization process adopted by CEOs in such situations. Additionally, we identified various decision-making models to manage the same crisis, with each model presenting a different level of involvement of other actors in the decision-making process, reflecting the CEO's unique vision and background.

conclusionsThis research makes a significant contribution to the growing literature on crisis management in three key ways. First, it emphasizes the importance of analyzing the decision-making process through the combined lens of different dimensions and phases. Second, it enhances the Arendt et al. (2015) model to include multiple critical dimensions of the decision-making process beyond the initial focus on decentralization, and demonstrates how, in a crisis context, the actors involved by the CEOs diverge from the original framework. Third, it offers new insights into the variables affecting the roles of the CEOs and other key actors in crisis-related decision-making, transcending the boundaries of role theory. In terms of managerial implications, reflecting on and interpreting the core of the organization's decision-making processes, can support top management teams in navigating change, providing them a more robust and rational base for guiding the transition to a post-crisis "new normal".

Indexed as

Chief Executive Officers, HospitalDecision MakingDecision Making, OrganizationalDelivery of Health CareProfessional RoleHumansInterviews as TopicItalyModels, OrganizationalQualitative ResearchCrisis managementDecision-making modelsDecision-making processHealthcare

Identifiers

PMID39966924
PMCPMC11837454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.