ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Are technical performance differences in wheelchair fencing linked to disability categories?
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to examine differences in muscle activity and activation timing in wheelchair fencers across disability categories A and B to better understand the neuromuscular dynamics involved in their performance.
methodsSixteen right-handed wheelchair fencers from the Polish National Paralympic Team, grouped into categories A and B, participated in the study. Muscle activity and activation timing (reaction time) were recorded during a visual-cue task using a surface electromyography system and a 3D accelerometer. Eight upper body muscles, including the deltoid, triceps, biceps, forearm extensors/flexors, latissimus dorsi, and obliques, were assessed. Data were processed using MyoResearch and MATLAB, and statistical analyses utilized the Wald-Wolfowitz runs test.
resultsIntergroup differences in reaction time and muscle activity were found: category A fencers tended to achieve lower reaction times and higher muscle bioelectric tension values than category B fencers. Significant differences between the groups were found in the activity of the left latissimus dorsi and the deltoid muscles (p < 0.05).
conclusionsThe study indicates the important role of the back and abdominal muscles as stabilizing postural muscles in wheelchair fencing. The significant differences in muscle activity for the back and deltoid muscles suggest distinct neuromuscular profiles between disability categories A and B. These findings could enhance classification accuracy and inform training strategies for para-athletes, optimizing performance and targeting specific muscle groups for improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.