ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2025
Postoperative endophthalmitis treatment with antibiotics associated or not with pars plana vitrectomy: a randomized clinical trial.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04192994 (Evaluation do Early Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Acute Endophthalmitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation do Early Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Acute Endophthalmitis
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intracameral antibiotic prophylaxis and surgical expertise: key determinants in endophthalmitis after cataract surgery.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Article
- Chitosan-Coated Silver-Vancomycin Nanoparticles for Treatment of Bacterial Endophthalmitis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Correction: Postoperative endophthalmitis treatment with antibiotics associated or not with pars plana vitrectomy: a randomized clinical trial.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative endophthalmitis (PSE) is a severe ocular complication that can lead to irreversible vision loss or even globe atrophy. The Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study (EVS) historically guided PSE management but is increasingly questioned due to advances in pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) techniques and its narrow focus on cataract surgery. This study aimed to compare PPV followed by intravitreal antibiotic injection at the end of surgery (PPV + IVAIES) with intravitreal antibiotic injection alone (IVAI) in managing PSE.
methodsThis randomized clinical trial included 35 pseudophakic patients with PSE following cataract extraction, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections, or glaucoma surgeries. Participants were randomized to receive either PPV + IVAIES (n = 12) or IVAI (n = 23). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed at baseline and days 7, 30, 60, and 90 post-intervention. Clinical worsening, defined as lack of improvement or progression of symptoms within 48-72 h, guided retreatment protocols. Group A (PPV + IVAIES) received repeat IVAI if required, while Group B (IVAI) underwent delayed PPV with repeat IVAI. Statistical significance was assessed using repeated measures ANOVA and logistic regression.
resultsBoth groups showed significant BCVA improvement (p < 0.001). PPV + IVAIES resulted in faster recovery, with superior BCVA at day 7 (p = 0.019) and day 30 (p = 0.041). Retreatment was required in 39.1% of the IVAI group but not in the PPV + IVAIES group (p = 0.015). Subgroup analysis indicated a trend toward better early outcomes with early PPV (p = 0.029).
conclusionsEarly PPV + IVAIES provides faster visual recovery and reduces retreatment rates compared to IVAI alone. Multicenter studies are warranted to confirm these findings and refine clinical guidelines. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04192994.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.