Observational studyBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Workload in antenatal care before and after implementation of an electronic decision support system: an observed time-motion study of healthcare providers in Nepal.
Observational study in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The implementation realities of a digital antenatal care improvement intervention: Insights from ethnographic work in primary health facilities in Nepal.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare interventions are shaped by the resources needed to implement them, including staff time. This study, part of a process evaluation, aims to compare time spent on antenatal care (ANC) and related recordkeeping in two rural primary-level health facilities in Nepal, before and after implementation of an electronic decision support system intervention to improve ANC quality that required additional electronic documentation.
methodsThe study is a before-and-after, observational time-motion assessment. Researchers used the WOMBAT (Work Observation Method By Activity Timing) software to observe and record activities performed by auxiliary nurse midwives providing ANC in two rounds of data collection. We summed the observation time (in minutes) spent on activity categories for each day of observation, in each round of data collection. For each auxiliary nurse midwife, we estimated the proportion of total observation time spent on activities and compared these proportions before and after intervention implementation. We also compared the mean minutes per day spent on ANC and recordkeeping in the two rounds.
resultsSix auxiliary nurse midwives were observed over two data collection rounds (41 total observation days). Prior to intervention, providers spent 7% of their workday on ANC and 6% on related recordkeeping, and time spent on these activities did not change after intervention implementation. Only one of the six auxiliary nurse midwives demonstrated a statistically significant increase in time spent on ANC and recordkeeping after implementation. There was considerable day-to-day variation in ANC time, and substantial periods of "non-work" time (on break or not engaged in work-related activity). Non-work time reduced from 42% in the first round to 26% in the second round of data collection.
conclusionsTime spent on ANC and related recordkeeping was low and did not change after implementation of the electronic decision support system. ANC and recordkeeping time was sensitive to day-to-day fluctuations in numbers of women attending for ANC at these rural facilities, which may have masked the intervention's effects. However, the large amount of non-work time observed suggests time constraints during the workday were not a major factor inhibiting use of the electronic decision support system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.