ArticleBMC psychology2025
Greater psychological distance, better creative-idea selection: the mediating role of construal level.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cogito, Ergo Contraho: Think Big or Think Small? How Construal Level Theory Shapes Creative Agreements.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCreativity research has often focused on idea generation rather than the crucial process of idea selection, which is essential for identifying practical and innovative solutions. Previous studies suggest that individuals frequently struggle with effectively selecting creative ideas, often performing no better than random chance. Psychological distance, defined as the subjective perception of how close or distant an event is, can facilitate decision-making and creative cognition, offering a potential mechanism for enhancing creative-idea selection.
methodsThe research consists of four studies examining the effects of psychological distance on creative-idea selection and the mediating role of construal level in this relationship. Study 1a investigates the correlation between perceived psychological distance and idea-selection performance. Study 1b manipulates psychological distance to assess its effects on idea selection. Study 2 introduces the construal level as a mediating variable and tests a mediation model. Finally, Study 3 manipulates the construal level directly to confirm its causal relationship with creative-idea selection.
resultsOur results indicate that greater psychological distance is associated with higher originality in the selected ideas and an increased selection of optimal ideas. However, psychological distance does not significantly impact the usefulness of the ideas. Study 1a found a positive correlation between psychological distance and the originality of selected ideas. Study 1b further confirmed that manipulating psychological distance enhances the originality of selected ideas and increases the rate of optimal idea selection. Study 2 demonstrated that construal level mediates the relationship between psychological distance and idea selection, particularly influencing originality. Study 3 confirmed the causal role of construal level, showing that a higher-level construal mindset leads to the selection of more original ideas.
conclusionsThis research underscores the importance of psychological distance and construal level in creative-idea selection. Increasing psychological distance can enhance individuals' ability to select more creative ideas by fostering higher-level construals. These findings offer practical implications for improving the creative selection processes in various contexts, suggesting that subtle cues (e.g., emphasizing future scenarios or abstract thinking) can help individuals make more effective creative choices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.