Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39966806›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Navigating life after gastric cancer surgery: a qualitative exploration of the dyadic patient-caregiver perspective on quality of life outcomes.

Yingying Gu, Xiuxiu Ma, Hanjia Xin, Ziying Xiang, Yanmei Chen, Chaozhu He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Quality of life and appraisal factors of patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Outcomes That Matter in Gastrointestinal Cancer Care: A Focus Group Study of Patient-Centred Outcomes Identified by Patients and Care Partners.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  5. Quality of life dynamics in the gastric cancer dyad: an actor-partner interdependence model analysis guiding the development of a family-centered nursing framework.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Navigating work after prostate cancer treatment: a systematic review of qualitative research.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yingying GuSchool of Nursing, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Xiuxiu MaSchool of Nursing, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Hanjia XinSchool of Nursing, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Ziying XiangSchool of Nursing, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Yanmei ChenDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Chaozhu HeSchool of Nursing, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. 1250896898@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGastric cancer (GC) families as a whole face the stressful time of cancer together, and the quality of life (QoL) of both the patient and the caregiver can be affected. Most past researchers have focused on the QoL of GC patients, but have neglected the role that caregivers play in the treatment process. The purpose of this study was to examine the factors influencing QoL of GC patients and their family caregivers, to compare the interactions and similarities and differences between the two influences, and to construct a conceptual model of the influences on QoL of GC patients and their caregivers based on the results of the study.

methodsThis descriptive qualitative study was conducted in 2024 at two branches of a tertiary hospital in China, and participants were recruited by adopting a purposive sampling approach, where participants were patients with GC who met the criteria recommended by gastrointestinal surgeons and nurses, and caregivers were designated by patients. The sample was selected considering maximum differentiation, such as age, gender, cancer stage, and disease duration of the respondents. The sample size was based on data saturation with no new themes emerging. Based on the results of the pre-interviews, we made some adjustments to the interview format, i.e., interviewing some informants individually and others jointly. We used semi-structured interviews for data collection for the qualitative study, where participants were informed about the study, their roles, the risks and benefits of the study, and signed an informed consent form before the interviews began. In addition, the quality of field notes was assessed after each session. The process was the same for all interviews. To ensure the accuracy of the information, all information transmitted on paper was reviewed while listening to the recorded voice. We used directed content analysis to analyze the content of the interviews.

resultsA total of 30 patients and 26 caregivers were interviewed. Four themes emerged from the study, which were contextual factors (disease-specific factors, physical and social environments and individual and family characteristics), knowledge and belief factors (self symptom assessment and healthcare seeking behavior, health information delivery and accessibility, life priority adjustment), self-regulation factors (strategies for health behavior change, role adaptation and emotion regulation) and social facilitators (positive motivation and emotional support from family, friends, and society, missing companionship and challenges encountered by family and friends visiting the patient after surgery, caregiving burdens and challenges). In addition, the study confirmed a high correlation between the QoL of patients and caregivers.

conclusionOur results address past gaps in the understanding of QoL for families with GC and update the concept of QoL by constructing a conceptual model of the factors that influence QoL for GC survivors and caregivers, as well as outlining the changes needed to improve health outcomes and QoL for survivors and their caregivers.

Indexed as

CaregiversQuality of LifeStomach NeoplasmsAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchDyadic perspectiveFamily caregiverGastric cancerHealth promotionQualitative studyQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID39966806
PMCPMC11837724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.