ArticleBMC surgery2025
A nomogram for postoperative pulmonary infections in esophageal cancer patients: a two-center retrospective clinical study.
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [A two-stage model for predicting postoperative pulmonary infection in esophageal cancer patients].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Article
- Identification and validation of an explainable machine learning model for early postoperative pulmonary complications after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Preoperative Aggregate Index of Systemic Inflammation is Associated with 30-Day Postoperative Pneumonia After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications in esophageal cancer: focus on inflammatory markers.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative pulmonary infections (POPIs) occur in approximately 13-38% of patients who undergo surgery for esophageal cancer, negatively impacting patient outcomes and prolonging hospital stays. This study aims to develop a novel clinical prediction model to identify patients at risk for POPIs early, thereby enabling timely intervention by clinicians.
methodsThis study included 910 patients from two hospitals. Of these, 795 patients from one hospital were randomly assigned to the training cohort (n = 556) and the validation cohort (n = 239) at a 7:3 ratio. The external test cohort consisted of 115 patients from the second hospital. A nomogram was developed via logistic regression to predict the incidence of POPIs. The model's discrimination, precision and clinical benefit were evaluated by constructing a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calculating the area under the ROC curve (AUC), performing a calibration plot, conducting decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curves (CIC).
resultsMultivariate logistic regression revealed that age, anemia, neoadjuvant therapy, T stage, thoracic adhesions and duration of surgery were independent risk factors for POPIs. The AUC for the training cohort was 0.8095 (95% CI: 0.7664-0.8527), that for the validation cohort was 0.8039 (95% CI: 0.7436-0.8643), and that for the external test cohort was 0.7174 (95% CI: 0.6145-0.8204). Calibration plots demonstrated good agreement between the predicted and observed probabilities, while DCA and CIC demonstrated good clinical applicability of the model in three cohorts.
conclusionThe nomogram, which incorporates six key factors, effectively predicts the risk of POPIs and can serve as a valuable tool for clinicians in identifying high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.