ArticleBMC oral health2025
The influence of different factors on the bond strength of lithium disilicate-reinforced glass-ceramics to Resin: a machine learning analysis.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of resin infiltration and Er: YAG laser on the shear bond strength between glass ceramics and white spot lesions: an in vitro study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Non-Thermal Plasma and Ho: YAG Laser Surface Conditioning: Effective Superior Alternatives to Sandblasting for 3Y-TZP Zirconia-Composite Repair Bonding.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Synergistic Effect of a Combined 10-MDP/γ-MPTS Primer on Glass-Ceramic Bonding: A Multimodal Study.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Optimizing adhesive protocols for CAD-CAM restorations: Is simplification a reliable alternative to conventional silane application?The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo assess the influence of various factors on the bond strength of glass-based ceramics and develop a model that can predict the bond strength values using machine learning (ML).
methodsThe bond strength values of lithium disilicate-reinforced glass-ceramics were collected from existing literature. Nineteen features were listed, and 9 ML algorithms, including logistic regression, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, decision tree, ensemble methods (extra trees, random forest, gradient boosting, and extreme gradient boosting), and multilayer perceptron, were employed. Importance analysis was performed to determine the significance of the 19 features. A new data set comprising the top five contributing features was used for bond strength class prediction. Grid search cross-validation (CV) and stratified tenfold CV were employed for hyperparameter tuning and model performance assessments. The evaluation metrics used were the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy. Nested CV was also employed to assess the model performance and avoid untruly optimistic results.
resultsA total of 193 bond strength values were collected. Hydrofluoric acid concentration and etching time, gamma-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane or 10-methacryloxydecyldihydrogen phosphate in the primer, and Bis-GMA in the cement were the top five features contributing to the bond strength. Stratified CV produced AUC scores of 0.71-0.93 and accuracy scores of 0.64-0.83. Extreme gradient boosting achieved superior model performance and accuracy and demonstrated good performance in predicting the range of bond strength values.
conclusionsML shows promise as a data-driven tool for predicting the bond strength of glass-based ceramics to resin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.