ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Predicting mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact using a machine learning approach.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Priority Intrapartum Services Associated with Childbirth Experience During Vaginal Birth: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Predictive Model for Intrapartum Cesarean Delivery in Multiparous Women After Active Labor Onset.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2026Article
- The power of machine learning models in predicting gestational diabetes mellitus.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Modeling Factors Associated With Diarrhea Caused by Cryptosporidium Species Using Machine Learning Methods.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2026Article
- A Machine Learning Approach to Predicting Household Smoke Exposure Risk in Somalia: An Analysis With SHAP Explanations.Environmental health insights · 2026Article
- Clinical audit of skin-to-skin contact and initiation of breastfeeding after birth.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Developing a prognostic model for predicting preterm birth using a machine learning algorithm.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Developing and validating a risk prediction model for caesarean delivery in Northwest Amhara comprehensive specialized hospitals.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Identifying determinants and predicting cesarean section delivery among Bangladeshi women using machine learning: Insight from BDHS 2022 Data.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Early prediction of low birth weight using boosting ensemble machine learning: A retrospective cohort study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the known benefits of skin-to-skin contact (SSC), limited data exists on its implementation, especially its influencing factors. The current study was designed to use machine learning (ML) to identify the predictors of SSC.
methodsThis study implemented predictive SSC approaches based on the data obtained from the "Iranian Maternal and Neonatal Network (IMaN Net)" from January 2020 to January 2022. A predictive model was built using nine statistical learning models (linear regression, logistic regression, decision tree classification, random forest classification, deep learning feedforward, extreme gradient boost model, light gradient boost model, support vector machine, and permutation feature classification with k-nearest neighbors). Demographic, obstetric, and maternal and neonatal clinical factors were considered as potential predicting factors and were extracted from the patient's medical records. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F_1 Score were measured to evaluate the diagnostic performance.
resultsOf 8031 eligible mothers, 3759 (46.8%) experienced SSC. The algorithms created by deep learning (AUROC: 0.81, accuracy: 0.75, precision: 0.67, recall: 0.77, and F_1 Score: 0.73) and linear regression (AUROC: 0.80, accuracy: 0.75, precision: 0.66, recall: 0.75, and F_1 Score: 0.71) had the highest performance in predicting SSC. Doula support, neonatal weight, gestational age, attending childbirth classes, and maternal age were the critical predictors for SSC based on the top two algorithms with superior performance.
conclusionsAlthough this study found that the ML model performed well in predicting SSC, more research is needed to make a better conclusion about its performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.