Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39966775›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Predicting mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact using a machine learning approach.

Sanaz Safarzadeh, Nastaran Safavi Ardabili, Mohammadsadegh Vahidi Farashah, Nasibeh Roozbeh, Fatemeh Darsareh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sanaz SafarzadehMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Nastaran Safavi ArdabiliDepartment of Midwifery, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran.
Mohammadsadegh Vahidi FarashahMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Nasibeh RoozbehMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
Fatemeh DarsarehMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran. famadarsareh@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the known benefits of skin-to-skin contact (SSC), limited data exists on its implementation, especially its influencing factors. The current study was designed to use machine learning (ML) to identify the predictors of SSC.

methodsThis study implemented predictive SSC approaches based on the data obtained from the "Iranian Maternal and Neonatal Network (IMaN Net)" from January 2020 to January 2022. A predictive model was built using nine statistical learning models (linear regression, logistic regression, decision tree classification, random forest classification, deep learning feedforward, extreme gradient boost model, light gradient boost model, support vector machine, and permutation feature classification with k-nearest neighbors). Demographic, obstetric, and maternal and neonatal clinical factors were considered as potential predicting factors and were extracted from the patient's medical records. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F_1 Score were measured to evaluate the diagnostic performance.

resultsOf 8031 eligible mothers, 3759 (46.8%) experienced SSC. The algorithms created by deep learning (AUROC: 0.81, accuracy: 0.75, precision: 0.67, recall: 0.77, and F_1 Score: 0.73) and linear regression (AUROC: 0.80, accuracy: 0.75, precision: 0.66, recall: 0.75, and F_1 Score: 0.71) had the highest performance in predicting SSC. Doula support, neonatal weight, gestational age, attending childbirth classes, and maternal age were the critical predictors for SSC based on the top two algorithms with superior performance.

conclusionsAlthough this study found that the ML model performed well in predicting SSC, more research is needed to make a better conclusion about its performance.

Indexed as

Kangaroo-Mother Care MethodMachine LearningMother-Child RelationsAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMothersPregnancyArtificial intelligenceMachine learningSkin-to-skin contact

Identifiers

PMID39966775
PMCPMC11837404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.