Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Alternative approach to monitoring labor: purple line.
Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent methods used to assess the progress of labor are often invasive and may cause discomfort to the mother. The purple line offers potential as a non-invasive marker for monitoring the labor process. However, its sensitivity and specificity in assessing critical components of labor, such as cervical dilatation and fetal descent, have not been adequately studied in different populations. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the purple line, a method for assessing labor progress.
methodsData for this observational study were collected from 304 pregnant women who presented to a maternity hospital for birth on the Anatolian side of Istanbul between May and November 2021. The inclusion criteria for the study were that women were 38-42 weeks of gestation, spontaneous labor had started and were in active labor phase. Participants were selected by random sampling method among women who met the study criteria during labor. Data collection included demographic information, partograph records, and measurements of the purple line. Women's birth was assessed and documented on a partogram, with the purple line measured hourly via a disposable tape measure until birth. Descriptive analyses including means and standard deviations, medians and interquartile ranges, and cut-off point and sensitivity-specificity (ROC) values were performed for data analysis.
resultsA purple line was seen in 85.9% of pregnant women at any stage of labour, with a specificity of 86% and sensitivity of 65%. During the active phase of labor, the measurements of the purple line length in the sacral region increased proportionally with cervical dilatation. The sensitivity was 56%, and the specificity was 65% when the fetal head descent reached the - 2 level.
conclusionsIn conclusion, the purple line in the sacral region is a non-invasive method to assess the course of labor and can be used as an adjunct to vaginal examinations and may reduce the number of vaginal examinations in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.