Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39966695›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2025

A new distal fibular fragment of Homo floresiensis and the first quantitative comparative analysis of proximal and distal fibular morphology in this species.

Annalisa Pietrobelli, Damiano Marchi, Sofwan Noerwidi, Nico Alamsyah, Thomas Sutikna, Tracy L Kivell, Matthew M Skinner, Matthew W Tocheri

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clades, Grades, and the Genus Problem: A Case for Revising Hominin Taxonomy.American journal of biological anthropology · 2026
    Review
  2. Comparative Morphometric Analysis of the Pelvis of LB 1 (Homo floresiensis).American journal of biological anthropology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Annalisa PietrobelliDepartment of Human Origins, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2558-1118
Damiano MarchiDepartment of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Sofwan NoerwidiPusat Riset Arkeometri, Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Nico AlamsyahPusat Riset Arkeometri, Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Thomas SutiknaPusat Riset Arkeometri, Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Tracy L KivellDepartment of Human Origins, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Matthew M SkinnerDepartment of Human Origins, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Matthew W TocheriAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7600-8998

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 819960Max-Planck-GesellschaftSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada 435-2017-1234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hindlimb skeleton of the holotype (LB1) of Homo floresiensis is relatively complete and includes both fibulae, which despite being well preserved have yet to be subject to a quantitative comparative analysis with other hominids. A new distal fragment of a fibula has also been recovered from the H. floresiensis-bearing sediments at Liang Bua (Flores, Indonesia). In this study, we used 3D geometric morphometrics (3DGM) to quantify detailed aspects of the external shape and articular facet morphology of the proximal and distal ends of these H. floresiensis fibulae. The comparative sample included fibulae from 57 extant great apes (Pongo, Gorilla, and Pan), 41 recent and fossil Homo sapiens, five Australopithecus afarensis, and five Neandertals. Shape variation was analyzed using principal component analysis of Procrustes coordinates, and mean differences among taxa were tested using a Procrustes ANOVA with a randomization procedure. Size comparisons were made using centroid size and tested via correlations with principal component scores. Results demonstrate that H. floresiensis fibulae possess the absolute smallest mean linear dimensions and mean centroid sizes among our comparative sample. The proximal and distal fibular ends of H. floresiensis exhibit four key features adapted for obligate bipedalism while also displaying a suite of plesiomorphic traits shared with extant great apes and A. afarensis that, compared with that of H. sapiens and Neandertals, suggest a more versatile ankle joint with a greater range of motion and enhanced load-bearing capabilities of the fibula. Our results are consistent with other aspects of the H. floresiensis lower limb, such as long feet relative to the femur and a long forefoot relative to the hindfoot, that together suggest an australopith-like locomotor repertoire that included both obligate bipedalism and climbing.

Indexed as

FibulaFossilsHominidaeAnimalsHumansfibulaeFloreshomininlower limb

Identifiers

PMID39966695
PMCPMC12079756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.