ReviewNature protocols2025
Construction of RNA reference materials for improving the quantification of transcriptomic data.
Review in Nature protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RNA reference materials and their corresponding reference datasets act as the 'ground truth' for the normalization of experimental values and are indispensable tools for reliably measuring intrinsically small differences in RNA-sequencing data, such as those between molecular subtypes of diseases in clinical samples. However, the variability in 'absolute' expression profiles measured across different batches, methods or platforms limits the use of conventional RNA reference datasets. We recently proposed a ratio-based method for constructing reference datasets. The ratio for a gene is defined as the normalized expression levels between two sample groups and produces more reliable values than the 'absolute' values obtained across diverse transcriptomic technologies and batches. Our gene ratios have been used for the successful generation of omics-wide reference datasets. Here, we describe a step-by-step process for establishing RNA reference materials and reference datasets, covering three stages: (1) reference materials, including material preparation, homogeneity testing and stability testing; (2) ratio-based reference datasets, including characterization, uncertainty estimation and orthogonal validation; and (3) applications, including definition of performance metrics, performing proficiency tests and diagnosing and correcting batch effects. This approach established the Quartet RNA reference materials and reference datasets (chinese-quartet.org) that have been approved as the first suite of nationally certified RNA reference materials by China's State Administration for Market Regulation. The protocol can be utilized to establish and apply reference materials to improve RNA-sequencing data quality in diverse clinical settings. The procedure can be completed in 2 d and requires expertise in molecular biology and bioinformatics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39966680What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.