ReviewNature reviews. Urology2025
Treatment strategies in human papillomavirus-related advanced penile cancer.
Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neoadjuvant Treatment for Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review of Contemporary Evidence.Cancers · 2026Review
- Targeting histone deacetylation, cell cycle regulators and heat shock proteins as novel therapeutic strategies for penile cancers.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic and treatment delays in penile cancer: a call to improve awareness and referral.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy achieves clinical complete response in elderly metastatic penile cancer: a case report.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- The past, present and future of penile cancer in the Nordic countries. Results from NORDCAN.BJUI compass · 2025Article
- CircRNA Sequencing Analysis Reveals the Regulatory Role of circ_CDR1as in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma via the ceRNA Network.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Penile cancer is a rare neoplasm with heterogeneous prevalence influenced by risk factors such as smoking, poor hygiene and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Southern Africa, South America and Southeast Asia have the highest incidence of this disease. Penile squamous cell carcinomas (PSCCs) account for the majority of instances of penile cancer, with HPV-related carcinogenesis implicated in up to half of them. Increases in PSCC incidence in industrialized nations parallel the rising high-risk HPV infection rates, particularly HPV-16. Early-stage, localized PSCC is often manageable, but treatment options in advanced disease remain limited, with poor survival outcomes. Emerging evidence suggests that HPV-positive PSCC might exhibit unique therapeutic responses, including increased sensitivity to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, as has been observed in HPV-driven head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Results of studies in HPV-positive PSCC demonstrate improved responses to chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapy, underscoring the potential for tailored treatments and de-escalation. Additionally, incorporating immunotherapy with radiotherapy in HPV-driven PSCC might provide greater oncological benefits than standard chemotherapy. These observations suggest that treatment strategies for HPV-positive PSCC might benefit from de-escalated chemoradiotherapy regimens or immunotherapy incorporation, potentially optimizing efficacy while minimizing toxic effects. Furthermore, biomarkers such as tumour mutational burden, programmed cell death ligand 1 expression, and genetic alterations could be crucial for predicting treatment response. Comprehensive biomarker assessment and accurate HPV status determination are essential for developing patient-tailored therapeutic strategies. These data provide evidence of the potential benefits of individualized approaches based on tumour biology and biomarker profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39966660What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.