ArticleScientific reports2025
Innovative adaptive edge detection for noisy images using wavelet and Gaussian method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated measurement of the minimum macular hole diameter based on optical coherence tomography images.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- A CNN-transformer dual-branch network with structure-aware loss for high-resolution edge detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multimodal breast cancer diagnosis using feature fusion and deep learning.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A Multiscale Gradient Fusion Method for Color Image Edge Detection Using CBM3D Filtering.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Reducing Noise and Improving Image Contrast with a Hybrid Approach to Enhance the Quality of Medical Imaging.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Edge detection is a crucial task in image processing and remote sensing, particularly for accurately identifying and separating shapes in noisy digital images. To enhance robustness and detail in edge detection, this study presents an innovative edge detection method, which integrates a denoising module and an adaptive thresholding technique to effectively address challenges associated with Gaussian noise in images. The proposed denoising module employs wavelet and Gaussian denoising functions to decompose, filter, and reconstruct the image, thereby reducing the impact of noise and enhancing image quality. For edge detection, an adaptive thresholding method based on a modified OTSU method is utilized. Comprehensive experiments validate the proposed framework by comparing detected edges against ground truth across various levels of Gaussian noise (0.1%, 10%, 20%, and 30%). The median thresholding function is chosen for its stability and convenience, while hard thresholding is avoided due to its tendency to introduce artifacts. Objective metrics, including Mean Squared Error (MSE), Accuracy, and Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), are employed for evaluation. Comparative results indicate that the proposed method outperforms traditional methods, such as Canny and Roberts, showcasing its effectiveness in edge detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.