ArticleScientific reports2025
Towards full integration of explainable artificial intelligence in colon capsule endoscopy's pathway.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Wireless Capsule Endoscopy: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Recent technological advances in video capsule endoscopy: a comprehensive review.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Expected Values of Artificial Intelligence in Colon Capsule Endoscopy: Artificial Intelligence in Capsule Endoscopy Consortium Position Statement.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Comment on Altobelli et al. Colon Capsule Endoscopy as a Promising Diagnostic Tool in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Application of Explainable Artificial Intelligence Based on Visual Explanation in Digestive Endoscopy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Urgency for standardized protocols to improve clinical implementation of artificial intelligence in endoscopic diagnostics.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current evidence and future directions.Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopyReview
- Clinical Prediction Models to Guide the Selection of Patients for Colon Capsule Endoscopy Versus Colonoscopy Following FIT-Positive Screening.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
- Systematic meta-review: diagnostic accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy for colonic neoplasia with umbrella meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite recent surge of interest in deploying colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) for early diagnosis of colorectal diseases, there remains a large gap between the current state of CCE in clinical practice, and the state of its counterpart optical colonoscopy (OC). This is due to several factors, such as low quality bowel cleansing, logistical challenges around both delivery and collection of the capsule, and most importantly, the tedious manual assessment of images after retrieval. Our study, built on the "Danish CareForColon2015 trial (cfc2015)" is aimed at closing this gap, by focusing on the full integration of AI in CCE's pathway, where image processing steps linked to the detection, localization and characterisation of important findings are carried out autonomously using various AI algorithms. We developed a family of algorithms based on explainable deep neural networks (DNN) that detect polyps within a sequence of images, feed only those images containing polyps into two parallel independent networks to characterize, and estimate the size of important findings. Our recognition DNN to detect colorectal polyps was trained and validated ([Formula: see text]) and tested ([Formula: see text]) on an unaugmented database of 1751 images containing colorectal polyps and 1672 images of normal mucosa reached an impressive sensitivity of [Formula: see text], a specificity of [Formula: see text], and a negative predictive value (NPV) of [Formula: see text]. The characterisation DNN trained on an unaugmented database of 317 images featuring neoplastic polyps and 162 images of non-neoplastic polyps reached a sensitivity of [Formula: see text] and a specificity of [Formula: see text] in classifying polyps. The size estimation DNN trained on an unaugmented database of 280 images reached an accuracy of [Formula: see text] in correctly segmenting the polyps. By automatically incorporating important information including size, location and pathology of the findings into CCE's pathway, we moved a step closer towards the full integration of explainable AI (XAI) in CCE's routine clinical practice. This translates into a fewer number of unnecessary investigations and resection of diminutive, insignificant colorectal polyps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.