ArticleScientific reports2025
Diaphragm and sternocleidomastoid muscle activity with increasing inspiratory pressure loads in people after stroke.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Impact of Inspiratory Muscle Training on Diaphragm Thickness in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of unstable surface during loaded-inspiratory task on diaphragm and trunk muscle activity in stroke patients.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study reports the concomitant contraction pattern of the diaphragm and sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles at various inspiratory pressure loads in patients after stroke. Thirty-six participants (stroke duration: 3.6 ± 2.9 months) performed in random order, sets of 10 breaths at inspiratory loads of 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80%, maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP). Bilateral muscle activity of the SCMs and diaphragm thickness were recorded simultaneously using surface electromyography (sEMG) and ultrasonography, respectively. Diaphragmatic thickness was significantly lower on the hemiplegic side compared to the non-affected side. The magnitude of diaphragmatic contraction, reflected by the calculated thickening fraction (DTf) for both hemidiaphragms, increased with inspiratory load and peaked at 50% MIP, but then decreased with any further increase in inspiratory pressure. SCM recruitment continued to increase bilaterally with increasing inspiratory pressure and was highest at 80% MIP, with recruitment activity significantly higher on the hemiplegic side compared to the non-affected side. Our results suggest that inspiratory load demands above 50%MIP are primarily met by increased SCM activity without any increase in diaphragmatic contraction. Adopting training intensities greater than 50%MIP in clinical inspiratory muscle training (IMT) programs needs to be re-considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.