ArticleScientific reports2025
Linear regressive weighted Gaussian kernel liquid neural network for brain tumor disease prediction using time series data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- EEG-based harmful brain activity classification using deep learning and feature fusion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Breast cancer detection using optimized hyperbolic graph attention with bidirectional convolutional neural network.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- IoT-based bed and ventilator management system during the COVID-19 pandemic.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A brain tumor is an abnormal growth of cells within the brain or surrounding tissues, which can be either benign or malignant. Brain tumors develop in various regions of the brain, each affecting different functions such as movement, speech, and vision, depending on their location. Early prediction of brain tumors is crucial for improving survival rates and treatment outcomes. Advanced techniques, including medical imaging and machine learning, are widely used for early diagnosis. However, conventional machine learning and deep learning detection models face challenges in achieving high accuracy in brain tumor disease prediction while minimizing time complexity. To address this, a novel Linear Regressive Weighted Gaussian Kernel Liquid Neural Network (LRWGKLNN) model is developed. The proposed LRWGKLNN model comprises four major steps, namely data acquisition, preprocessing, feature selection, and classification. In the initial step, a large volume of time-series data samples is collected from a comprehensive dataset. Following data collection, preprocessing is performed, involving two key processes: handling missing data and outlier detection. First, the proposed LRWGKLNN model handles missing values using a linear regression method. After the imputation process, outlier data is identified and removed using the Generalized Extreme Studentized Deviation test. Once preprocessing is complete, the Cosine Congruence Weighted Majority Algorithm is employed to select significant features from the dataset while removing irrelevant features. This step helps minimize the brain tumor disease prediction time. Finally, the classification process is performed using the selected significant features with the Gaussian Kernelized Liquid Neural Network. This approach enhances the accuracy of brain tumor disease prediction using time-series data samples. The experimental evaluation is carried out using various performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and disease prediction time with respect to the number of time-series data samples. The obtained results demonstrate that the proposed LRWGKLNN model achieves higher 4%, 4% 5%, 4% and 4% accuracy, precision, recall, specificity and F1 score in brain tumor disease prediction. Furthermore, the LRWGKLNN model realizes a substantial reduction in time consumption with feature selection by 16% compared to existing deep learning methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.