ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-criteria decision-based optimization and multivariable regression analysis of date palm fiber reinforced concrete modified with silica fume under normal and elevated temperatures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization of natural fibre length in bacterial cement mortar using TOPSIS for enhanced mechanical properties.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Modeling and optimization of Multi-Waste foam geopolymers using central composite design and neural networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Considering its affordability and accessibility, the deployment of date palm fiber (DPF) in cement composites is progressively escalating. However, the primary downside of DPF in cementitious composite is its deleterious effect on the properties of the composite. To fully utilize DPF in concrete, measures to mitigate its undesirable effects must be used. To address this issue, silica fume was employed as a supplementary cementitious material (SCM) in the DPF-reinforced concrete. In this study, the DPF was appended in several measures between 0 and 3% by weight of cement, and silica fume was employed in dosages between 0 and 15% replacement by volume of cement. Testing was performed on the concrete at normal and high temperature exposure ranging between 200 and 800 °C. Multivariable regression analysis (MRA) was performed to develop and predict the relationship between the variables (silica fume and DPF) and the properties of the concrete. Numerous Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) procedures were used to systematically assess and select optimal concrete mixes based on a comprehensive range of performance criteria. The experimental results revealed that DPF instigated a depreciation in the mechanical performance of the concrete, the addition of silica fume mitigated these undesirable effects, with 10% silica fume being the optimum. The study employed mathematical and statistical models to predict the performance of Date Palm Fiber (DPF)-reinforced concrete, addressing the lack of suitable prediction models for DPF. The models were validated through residual compressive strength tests at 200 °C and 800 °C. ANOVA analysis confirmed the models' reliability and applicability in construction, demonstrating high predictability for both normal and elevated temperature conditions. Further, the MCDM analysis indicated that the mix M7 containing 1% DPF and 10% silica fume ranks highest across all methods, demonstrating superior thermo-mechanical and thermal performance despite a lower slump value due to its composition of 1% DPF and 10% silica fume.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.