ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting mental health disparities using machine learning for African Americans in Southeastern Virginia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Psychology: How AI and NLP Systems Are Reshaping Psychological Interventions. A Systematic Review.Clinical psychology & psychotherapyPooled it
- Digital Mental Health Through an Intersectional Lens: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Differential risk profiles for geriatric depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances in rural China: insights from the Taierzhuang cohort.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- A machine learning approach to healthcare needs and barriers using the 100% Community Survey of access to SDOH services.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined mental health disparities among African Americans using AI and machine learning for outcome prediction. Analyzing data from African American adults (18-85) in Southeastern Virginia (2016-2020), we found Mood Affective Disorders were most prevalent (41.66%), followed by Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders. Females predominantly experienced mood disorders, with patient ages typically ranging from late thirties to mid-forties. Medicare coverage was notably high among schizophrenia patients, while emergency admissions and comorbidities significantly impacted total healthcare charges. Machine learning models, including gradient boosting, random forest, neural networks, logistic regression, and Naive Bayes, were validated through 100 repeated 5-fold cross-validations. Gradient boosting demonstrated superior predictive performance among all models. Nomograms were developed to visualize risk factors, with gender, age, comorbidities, and insurance type emerging as key predictors. The study revealed higher mental health disorder prevalence compared to national averages, suggesting a potentially greater mental health burden in this population. Despite the limitations of its retrospective design and regional focus, this research provides valuable insights into mental health disparities among African Americans in Southeastern Virginia, particularly regarding demographic and clinical risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.