Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39966484›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

In vitro protein expression profile of cultivated muscle cells from Labeo rohita.

B S Yashwanth, Nevil Pinto, A Sathiyanarayanan, Kiran D Rasal, S Sanjeeva, Michael Saad, Reza Ovissipour, David L Kaplan, Mukunda Goswami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

B S YashwanthFish Genetics and Biotechnology Division, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai, 400061, India.
Nevil PintoFish Genetics and Biotechnology Division, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai, 400061, India.
A SathiyanarayananFish Genetics and Biotechnology Division, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai, 400061, India.
Kiran D RasalFish Genetics and Biotechnology Division, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai, 400061, India.
S SanjeevaDepartment of Bioscience and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, 400076, India.
Michael SaadDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Reza OvissipourDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
David L KaplanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA.
Mukunda GoswamiFish Genetics and Biotechnology Division, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai, 400061, India. mukugoswami@gmail.com.

Funding

Good Food Institute 2021-699012-35978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new cell line developed from the muscle tissue of L. rohita (LR) was utilized to understand the proteome in-depth. Comparative proteome analysis was performed for LR muscle cells at different passages (1, 15 and 25) using label free quantitative proteomics. A total of 138 proteins containing ≥ two unique peptides were used to assess expression at the different passages. Hierarchical clustering of the top 25 proteins with significant differences in abundances was plotted across the different passages with a fold-change of 1.5. Protein-protein interactions of significantly expressed proteins with respective KEGG pathways were represented using STRING. The metascape depicts the network of significantly enriched proteins with functional annotation of protein-encoding genes. Functional analysis of differentially expressed proteins was marked as glycolytic (eno1 and eno3), metabolic (pgm, smyd1, ak1, aldob and bpgm), cytoplasmic ribosomal (rpl27, rpl3 and eifa5) and carbon metabolic (pdh) pathways across the three passages. The expression of ribosomal proteins like eif5a, rps8a, rpl30, rpl27, rpl3 in the LR muscle cells participates in muscle growth and maintenance by altering translational capacity of the cells. Cytoskeletal proteins such as annexin and tropomyosin are involved in the adhesion and reorganization of cytoskeleton signaling during early differentiation of LR muscle cells. The proteins observed across the pathways were also correlated with the differentiation of LR muscle cells during myogenesis. The current study provides insight to determine the different groups of proteins that are expressed during the development of myotubes. Newly developed muscle cell line provides a benchmark for understanding in vitro myogenesis towards cultivated meat production.

Indexed as

CyprinidaeFish ProteinsMuscle CellsProteomeAnimalsCell LineProtein Interaction MapsProteomicsFish ProteinsProteomeDifferentially expressed proteinsLabel free quantificationLabeo rohitaMuscle cellsMyogenesisProtein–protein interactions

Identifiers

PMID39966484
PMCPMC11836462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.