ArticleScientific reports2025
The effects of an unfamiliar experimenter on proactive and reactive control in children.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Set-shifting and task-switching make differential contributions to divergent thinking in adolescence.BMC psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive control development across childhood is critical for later academic achievement. Despite recent advances in the comprehension of how the context influences cognitive control development, no study has ever addressed whether one of the most frequent contextual features of children's lives (i.e., the presence of another person) impacts control engagement. Here, 123 Chinese children aged 5 and 9 years-old performed, either in the presence of an experimenter or alone, an AX-CPT, a task assessing reactive and proactive control. We found that children were overall negatively affected by the experimenter presence in terms of latencies but not of accuracy. Further, when analysing the trial types separately, we observed that this effect mainly concerned trials requiring children to engage more proactive control and was greater for younger than older children. These results indicate that direct social factors such as the presence of an unfamiliar experimenter seem to modulate cognitive control performance. Future research should continue to examine these effects in the light of the numerous existing social presence theories in order to unravel what are the cognitive mechanisms affected by social presence in childhood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.