ArticleScientific reports2025
Integrating D-S evidence theory and multiple deep learning frameworks for time series prediction of air quality.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An emotion-oriented product evaluation model based on BP neural network and improved dempster-shafer theory.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Air quality prediction-based big data analytics using hebbian concordance and attention-based long short-term memory.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of air quality time series data is helpful to identify and warn air pollution events in advance. Although the current air quality prediction models have made some progress in improving the accuracy of prediction, due to the impact of specific pollutants or complex meteorological conditions, these models still have the problems of low prediction accuracy, robustness and generalization ability in univariate prediction. In order to solve these problems, this study proposes a framework that integrates D-S evidence theory and a variety of deep learning models. The air quality data of three representative cities with climate characteristics in China are obtained and five indicators on air pollutants are collected. The preprocessed data are divided by time length to form short-term, medium-term and long-term input data, and MLP, RNN, CNN, LSTM, BI-LSTM and GRU models are established respectively. By comparing the performance indicators of the six models, three most suitable models are selected to predict the short, medium and long-term data respectively. Taking the prediction results and reliability as the three evidence bodies of the theory, a fusion model based on D-S evidence theory is established. For the three performance indicators MAE, RMSE and MAPE of the model, the best result of the fusion model increases the performance by 7.42%, 4.25% and 12.82% compared with the sub optimal architecture. This shows that integrating D-S evidence theory and a variety of deep learning algorithms provides an effective method to accurately predict the long-term air quality level in most urban areas.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.