ArticleTranslational psychiatry2025
Common and disease-specific patterns of functional connectivity and topology alterations across unipolar and bipolar disorder during depressive episodes: a transdiagnostic study.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Common neural dysfunction in psychiatric disorders: Insights from a meta-analysis of resting-state fMRI studies.Translational psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Characterizing gradients of functional connectome underpinning rumination and their alteration in depression.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- From synapse to system: mechanistic pathways of neural signaling dysfunction in psychiatric disorders.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Multimodal MRI study of gray matter and functional connectivity abnormalities in adolescents with bipolar disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bipolar disorder (BD) and unipolar depression (UD) are defined as distinct diagnostic categories. However, due to some common clinical and pathophysiological features, it is a clinical challenge to distinguish them, especially in the early stages of BD. This study aimed to explore the common and disease-specific connectivity patterns in BD and UD. This study was constructed over 181 BD, 265 UD and 204 healthy controls. In addition, an independent group of 90 patients initially diagnosed with major depressive disorder at the baseline and then transferred to BD with the episodes of mania/hypomania during follow-up, was identified as initial depressive episode BD (IDE-BD). All participants completed resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (R-fMRI) at recruitment. Both network-based analysis and graph theory analysis were applied. Both BD and UD showed decreased functional connectivity (FC) in the whole brain network. The shared aberrant network across groups of patients with depressive episode (BD, IDE-BD and UD) mainly involves the visual network (VN), somatomotor networks (SMN) and default mode network (DMN). Analysis of the topological properties over the three networks showed that decreased clustering coefficient was found in BD, IDE-BD and UD, however, decreased shortest path length and increased global efficiency were only found in BD and IDE-BD but not in UD. The study indicate that VN, SMN, and DMN, which involve stimuli reception and abstraction, emotion processing, and guiding external movements, are common abnormalities in affective disorders. The network separation dysfunction in these networks is shared by BD and UD, however, the network integration dysfunction is specific to BD. The aberrant network integration functions in BD and IDE-BD might be valuable diagnostic biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.