Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39966346›Full record

ArticleBlood cancer journal2025

Clonal plasma cell proportion in the synthetic phase identifies a unique high-risk cohort in multiple myeloma.

Saurabh Zanwar, Dragan Jevremovic, Prashant Kapoor, Horatiu Olteanu, Francis Buadi, Pedro Horna, Wilson Gonsalves, Gregory Otteson, Abiola Bukunmi Bolarinwa, Suzanne Hayman and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood cancer journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Defining High-Risk Disease Biology in Multiple Myeloma: A Narrative Review.Blood and lymphatic cancer : targets and therapy · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Saurabh ZanwarDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5074-8453
Dragan JevremovicDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1792-5822
Prashant KapoorDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4342-364X
Horatiu OlteanuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5783-4485
Francis BuadiDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3214-0203
Pedro HornaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4909-6157
Wilson GonsalvesDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Gregory OttesonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Abiola Bukunmi BolarinwaDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5812-1954
Suzanne HaymanDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Nadine AbdallahDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9195-1589
Moritz BinderDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9014-9658
Joselle CookDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5335-9533
Angela DispenzieriDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8780-9512
David DingliDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7477-3004
Morie A GertzDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Taxiarchis KourelisDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8573-9434
Nelson LeungDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Yi LinDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1556-6416
Eli MuchtarDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Rahma WarsameDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Amie FonderDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Miriam HobbsDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Yi Lisa HwaDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Michelle RogersDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Robert A KyleDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
S Vincent RajkumarDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5862-1833
Shaji KumarDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Kumar.Shaji@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5392-9284

Funding

Project 4: Targeting Resistance to T-Cell Directed Therapy in Multiple MyelomaP50CA186781 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI Peter Leif Bergsagel · 2015 to 2026
$25.5M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA186781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk stratification models based on cytogenetics and disease burden help identify high-risk patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). However, some high-risk patients remain undetected. This study evaluated the prognostic utility of the proportion of clonal plasma cells in the S-phase of the cell cycle for NDMM. Patients with active multiple myeloma diagnosed between 01/01/2013 and 01/31/2023 who underwent S-phase assessment were included. The S-phase proportion was calculated by analyzing DNA content between G0/G1 and G2/M peaks. Among 823 patients, 16% (135) had S-phase ≥2% at diagnosis. Patients with S-phase ≥2% exhibited significantly worse median progression-free survival (PFS) of 1.4 years (95% CI: 1.2-1.9) compared to 2.9 years (95% CI: 2.6-3.3) for those with S-phase <2% (HR 1.6, p < 0.0001). Median overall survival (OS) was also significantly lower at 3.9 years (95% CI: 2.9-5.7) versus 9.2 years (95% CI: 7.9-not reached; HR 2.2, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed S-phase ≥2% as an independent predictor of inferior PFS (HR 1.56, p = 0.001) and OS (HR 2, p < 0.0001) after adjusting for R2-ISS risk, age, renal function, and treatment strategies. Among patients with S-phase ≥2%, 53% (68/129) experienced progression-free survival (PFS) under 18 months with upfront therapy. Elevated S-phase was associated with a 2.5-fold higher risk of progression within 18 months [OR 2.55 (95% CI: 1.7-3.7), p < 0.001]. Patients with elevated S-phase but no IMS-high risk had a median OS of 5.7 years (95% CI: 4.7-9.2), similar to the IMS-high risk cohort without elevated S-phase (5.4 years, 95% CI: 4-NR). Those with both elevated S-phase and IMS-high risk had significantly worse OS (3.1 years, 95% CI: 1.6-NR, p = 0.043). These findings suggest that S-phase ≥2% is a powerful, independent prognostic marker for NDMM.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaPlasma CellsS PhaseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID39966346
PMCPMC11836398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.