Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39966325›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2026

Feasibility and Effects of Exercise During Working Hours in Acute Hospital Staff - A Non-Randomized Controlled Trial.

S G Nielsen, M Pedersen, J U Toftager-Oster, C A Saervoll, T K Fischer, B Lindegaard, S Molsted

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04988724 (Impact of Physical Exercise at a Hospital Tested in a Pilot Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04988724 narecruitingnot on this map

Impact of Physical Exercise at a Hospital Tested in a Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNordsjaellands HospitalRan2022 to 2026Enrolled700ConditionsPain, Quality of Life, Health BehaviorArmsExercise training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S G NielsenDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital- North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark. susanne.groen.nielsen.01@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3085-6833
M PedersenDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital- North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7880-1969
J U Toftager-OsterDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital- North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1966-5592
C A SaervollEmergency Medical Services, Ballerup, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6667-6116
T K FischerDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital- North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4812-980X
B LindegaardDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5236-8427
S MolstedDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital- North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9214-046X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWorkplace health interventions with exercise have positive effects on musculoskeletal pain and well-being at work, however, effectiveness is questioned due to low adherence. In hospitals participation is challenged by shiftwork and unpredictable workload. Our aim was to investigate the feasibility of exercise during working hours in an acute hospital, herein to estimate the health impact to guide management decisions on implementation.

methodsA clinical trial in a public hospital, offering staff supervised group-based individualized exercise with combined aerobic and strength training during working hours twice weekly for 20 weeks. Delivery, acceptance, and adherence were investigated. Subjective outcomes were social capital, well-being, quality of life, and musculoskeletal pain were assessed. Objective outcomes were blood pressure, body composition, and cardiorespiratory fitness.

resultsTwenty-three percent of the employees (n = 617) accepted participation (92% female, median age was 50 years, 38% nurses). Adherence was 29% with no difference between employees with clinical versus non-clinical functions. Non-clinicians participated during working hours, while clinicians participated outside of working hours in 50% (IQR 5-87) of the sessions. Positive changes were seen in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (decreased 2.0 [0.9; 2.2] and 0.9 [0.1; 1.7] mmHG, respectively), aerobic capacity 2.3 ml/O2/min/kg [1.7; 2.9], and in waist-hip ratio, social capital, well-being, quality of life, and musculoskeletal pain.

conclusionExercise during working hours in an acute hospital staff was feasible, but strategies to increase acceptance and adherence are necessary for a successful implementation. Despite low adherence, the intervention was associated with improvements of physical and mental health. REGISTRATION: The study protocol has been uploaded on www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT04988724).

Indexed as

ExerciseExercise TherapyPersonnel, HospitalAdultBlood PressureBody CompositionCardiorespiratory FitnessFeasibility StudiesFemaleHospitals, PublicHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal PainOccupational HealthQuality of LifeExerciseFeasibility StudiesHealth promotionHospital personnelResistance trainingWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID39966325
PMCPMC13099752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.