ArticleThe AAPS journal2025
Addressing Clinical Challenges in Aberrant Pharmacokinetics of Biologic Therapeutic Drugs: Investigating Sample Processing Procedure in the Immunoassays.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioanalytical Pharmacokinetics (PK) methods are designed for robust performance under rigorous regulatory compliance requirements to ensure the generated data is reliable and maintains integrity. In a phase 1 dose-finding clinical study, aberrant PK profiles of two co-administered biologics drugs were observed. Unexpectedly, we discovered high fill levels in collection tubes from the majority of samples. This led to the hypothesis that the highly filled tubes might cause difficulty in achieving complete sample thaw and thorough mixing at the time of sample analysis, potentially contributing to the abnormalities observed in the PK dataset. Evaluation of the impact of sample fill levels and processing procedure can be challenging since PK concentrations of study samples were unknown. Therefore, a systematic approach was employed to conduct a thorough examination using mock samples. The data illustrate a correlation between sample thawing and mixing process and the variability in the PK data. The concentrations from properly filled mock samples that underwent complete thawing and mixing showed 100% data reproducibility. In contrast, the concentrations from fully filled mock samples that did not follow the proper procedure showed sample recovery deviating by ± 30% from nominal value and exhibited considerable lack of precision. This data identified the root cause of aberrant PK, justifying revised sample preparation guidance and sample re-assay. Improved sample handling and subsequent reassay resolved the aberrant PK profile issues. In conclusion, this study reiterated that sample handling plays a crucial role in quality and reproducibility of PK data with immunoassays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39966314What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.