Trial reportHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2025
Penetrating fixation device versus fibrin sealant for mesh fixation in laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multicentric pragmatic randomized controlled trial of mesh fixation system in primary and recurrent ventral hernia repair.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Beyond acronyms: a domain-based structural analysis of abdominal wall hernia repair techniques in the contemporary literature.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- A scoping review of outcome reporting in randomized controlled trials of incisional and non-incisional ventral hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluation of NBCA(n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate) surgical glue for mesh fixation in laparoscopic treatment of primary lateral incisional hernias.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- How Reproducible Are Abdominal Wall Surgical Techniques? A Methodological Assessment of Technical Reporting in the Contemporary Literature.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePost-operative pain following intra peritoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair of ventral hernia is commonly attributed to mechanical fixation devices. Fibrin sealant is a novel technique of mesh fixation purported to cause less pain. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative pain in these two methods of mesh fixation.
methodsThis was a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Eighty patients with primary ventral hernia underwent laparoscopic IPOM repair using PROCEED™ mesh, which was fixed with either mechanical fixation device, SECURESTRAP™ (MF group) or fibrin sealant, TISSEEL™ (FS group). Primary end point was postoperative pain at rest and movement on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 0-10. Operative time, recurrence, seroma and quality of life (QoL) were secondary outcomes. Patients were followed up for one year.
resultsThere was no significant difference in pain score at 12 h, 24 h, 7 days, 1, 3 and 12 months between the groups, except pain on movement, which was significantly less in the FS group on the seventh day (median VAS 3 vs. 2, p = 0.01). Mean operative time was 8 min longer in the FS group (p = 0.001). Two patients in the FS and none in the MF group had recurrence at one year (p = 0.18). Seroma formation, postoperative QoL and patient satisfaction scores were similar in both groups.
conclusionsUse of fibrin sealant for mesh fixation does not provide significant advantage over mechanical fixation in laparoscopic IPOM repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39966262What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.