ArticleBiochemical genetics2026
Comprehensive Codon Usage Analysis Across Diverse Plant Lineages.
Article in Biochemical genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of genome evolution inmSystems · 2026Article
- Codon usage bias and selective constraints in Gentianales mitogenomes.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Adaptive Evolution and Conservation Implications for the EndangeredGenes · 2024Article
- The Complete Chloroplast Genomes ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The variation of codon usage patterns in response to the evolution of organisms is an intriguing question to answer. This study investigated the relevance of the evolutionary events of vascularization and seed production with the codon usage patterns in different plant lineages. We found that the optimal codons of non-vascular lineages generally end with GC, whereas those of the vascular lineages end with AU. Correspondence analysis and model-based clustering showed that the evolution of the codon usage pattern follows the evolutionary event of the vascularization more precisely than that of the seed production. The dinucleotides CpG and TpA were under-represented in all the lineages, whereas the dinucleotide TpG was found over-represented in all the lineages, except algae. Evolutionary-related lineages showed similar codon pair bias. The dinucleotide CpA showed a similar representation as those of its parent codon pairs. Although natural selection predominates over mutational pressure in determining the codon usage bias, the relative influence of mutational pressure is higher in the non-vascular lineages than those in the vascular lineages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39966258What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.