ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2025
Mixed dry reverse micelles: potential carriers for oral protein delivery via SEDDS.
Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Strategies to Improve the Lipophilicity of Hydrophilic Macromolecular Drugs.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of mixed dry reverse micelles (dRMs) to increase the lipophilicity of therapeutic proteins and allow their incorporation into self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was incorporated in mixed dRMs, forming HRP-dRMs, using soybean phosphatidylcholine (SPC) and sodium docusate (SD) as surfactants. HRP-dRMs were characterized with respect to their distribution coefficient and stability in simulated physiological fluids. Moreover, HRP-dRMs were loaded in SEDDS, which were characterized for their payload, stability, distribution coefficients between the lipophilic phase of SEDDS and release medium and their ability to protect the incorporated protein towards enzymatic degradation in aqueous media containing trypsin and chymotrypsin. The synergistic effect of two surfactants to form dRMs led to a payload of 3% (w/v) for the model protein in a lipophilic phase without the use of organic cosolvents. Moreover, the HRP-dRMs incorporation increased the LogD
Indexed as
Identifiers
39966252What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.