Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39966198›Full record

Observational studyQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2025

Quality of life outcomes in colorectal cancer survivors: insights from an observational study at a tertiary cancer center.

Pola Marchewczyk, Beatriz Costeira, Francisca Brito da Silva, Daniela Cavadas, Nuno Abecasis, Manuel Limbert, João Maciel

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Structured pelvic floor physiotherapy rehabilitation for low anterior resection syndrome in colorectal cancer: An Australian feasibility study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pola MarchewczykFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, Lisboa, 1649-028, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-8152-2333
Beatriz CosteiraDepartment of General Surgery, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, R. Prof. Lima Basto, Lisboa, 1099-023, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5934-6792
Francisca Brito da SilvaFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, Lisboa, 1649-028, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1913-4768
Daniela CavadasFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, Lisboa, 1649-028, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6912-4978
Nuno AbecasisDepartment of General Surgery, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, R. Prof. Lima Basto, Lisboa, 1099-023, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5904-6244
Manuel LimbertFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, Lisboa, 1649-028, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4645-1574
João MacielFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, Lisboa, 1649-028, Portugal. jmaciel@ipolisboa.min-saude.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-1642

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeColorectal cancer (CRC) significantly impacts the quality of life (QoL) of survivors, yet detailed assessments of long-term QoL are sparse. This study evaluates QoL among CRC survivors, examining the influence of different treatments and patient characteristics on outcomes.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study at a tertiary cancer center in Portugal, enrolling CRC patients who underwent curative surgery from 2013 to 2022. QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year follow-up intervals. Subgroup analyses were performed based on tumor location, radiotherapy administration, chemotherapy administration, presence of a stoma, and time since treatment, with sociodemographic and clinical factors examined on univariate and multivariate analysis.

resultsOf the 825 eligible patients, 324 were invited and 179 participated (response rate: 55.2%). Overall, patients reported high global QoL and functional scores with low symptom scores, comparable to those of the general population. However, rectal cancer survivors experienced poorer outcomes in role and social functioning, body image, and symptom management. Those receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy reported more symptoms, with chemotherapy recipients showing lower functional scores. Patients with a stoma had significantly lower QoL across functional and symptom scales. Long-term survivors reported decreased physical functioning. Multivariate analysis identified female gender, open surgery, and chemotherapy as factors associated with reduced QoL.

conclusionThis study highlights significant disparities in QoL outcomes between CRC survivors, with QoL influenced by gender, cancer location, radiotherapy or chemotherapy, stoma presence, and survivorship duration, underscoring the need for personalized support programs and tailored care plans.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsColorectal NeoplasmsQuality of LifeAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPortugalSurveys and QuestionnairesTertiary Care CentersColon cancerColorectal cancerLong-term survivorsQuality of lifeRectal cancerStoma

Identifiers

PMID39966198
PMCPMC12064581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.