ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2025
Laparoscopic perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal resection.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Minimally invasive versus open abdominoperineal resection and the risk of postoperative perineal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePerineal hernia(PH) is a complication after abdominoperineal resection(APR), which is a special kind of incisional hernia, lacking consensus about treatment. This study is aimed at the effect of laparoscopic repair with mesh.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted from Januarary 1st 2015 to December 31st 2023 for the patients undergoing laparoscopic perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal resection(APR). The data of characteristics, surgery details and follow-up were collected and analysed to evaluate the effect and complications.
results41 cases were included altogether and all patients received laparoscopy approach, 14 males and 27 females, median age was 70 years(range 45-80years), the mean BMI was 25.04 ± 3.38 kg/m
conclusionLaparoscopic perineal hernia repair with mesh shows low rates of complications, which is a safe and effective method to perineal hernia after APR. For large defects, hybrid technique helps to close the defect and eliminate dead spaces. The appropriate kind and adequate mesh overlap are critical. Short-term follow up shows positive outcomes in this retrospective study and the controlled trial and long-term follow-up is needed in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39966193What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.