ArticleFamilial cancer2025
CHEK2-related breast cancer: real-world challenges.
Article in Familial cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Updated NCCN Guidelines on Clinical Management and Risk Communication forResearch square · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeManagement of cancer risks associated with the CHEK2 gene, a moderate penetrance breast cancer gene, is challenging in real-world practice. Family history, traditional breast cancer risk factors, and specific genetic CHEK2 variants are risk modifiers in this setting and add complexity for surveillance and risk-reduction decisions. Here, we present a case series of Brazilian CHEK2 carriers affected by breast cancer.
methodsPatients evaluated in the Oncogenetics Department of Hospital Sírio-Libanês (Brasília, Brazil) between November 2017 and September 2021, who had a personal history of breast cancer and a germline genetic test with a pathogenic or likely pathogenic CHEK2 variant, were selected for case description. Clinical pearls and knowledge gaps were highlighted for each case.
resultsTwelve women were included in this descriptive analysis. All patients had early-stage breast cancer. Most of them were diagnosed with breast cancer prior to age 50 (9/12) and had a close relative affected by breast cancer (9/12). Seven patients harbored intronic pathogenic variants. Clinical pearls included the following: lack of risk estimates for intronic CHEK2 variants among non-European ancestry CHEK2 carriers, environmental exposures as a risk modifier, notable non-breast cancer diagnosis at young ages, incidental germline finding during tumor profiling, breast cancer diagnosis before the recommended age of breast cancer screening, family history of breast cancer as a risk modifier, and clinical outcomes after breast cancer treatment.
conclusionsImprovements in cancer risk assessment and cancer prevention for CHEK2 carriers are still needed to overcome current clinical challenges on the management of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39966186What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.