ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Leptomeningeal metastases at recurrence in IDH-wildtype glioblastomas: incidence, risk factors, and prognosis based on postcontrast FLAIR imaging.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the Typical Atypical Imaging Features of Leptomeningeal Enhancement: A Case Series.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo comprehensively investigate the incidence, risk factors, and prognosis of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) diagnosed at recurrence in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 734 IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients were enrolled between 2005 and 2022. LM at recurrence was diagnosed with MRI including postcontrast FLAIR. Logistic analysis for development of LM at recurrence was performed with clinical, molecular, imaging (including tumor volume and distance to subventricular zone via automatic segmentation), and surgical data including extent of resection and ventricular entry. The overall survival (OS) was compared between patients with and without LM at recurrence.
resultsThe incidence of LM at recurrence based on postcontrast FLAIR was 10.8% (79 patients). On multivariable analysis, younger age at diagnosis (odds ratio (OR) = 0.98, p = 0.011) and ventricular entry (OR = 3.15, p < 0.001) were independent predictors of LM at recurrence. However, patients with LM at recurrence showed no significant difference in OS from patients without LM (log-rank test; p = 0.461), with median OS of 18.0 (95% confidence interval (CI) 16.2-19.8) and 18.5 (95% CI 16.4-20.7) months in patients with and without LM at recurrence, respectively.
conclusionThe incidence of LM at recurrence is relatively high in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients. Younger age and ventricular entry during surgery warrant imaging surveillance for LM at recurrence. As LM at recurrence showed no significant OS compromise and larger extent of resection (EOR) is associated with survival benefits, ventricular entry during maximal safe resection may be acceptable. KEY POINTS: Question The incidence, risk factors, and prognosis of leptomeningeal metastases (LM) diagnosed at recurrence in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients are currently unknown. Findings LM at recurrence occurred in 10.8% of cases, with younger age and ventricular entry as risk factors, but no significant difference in survival outcomes between groups. Clinical relevance The incidence, risk factors, and prognosis of LM at recurrence were investigated in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients with postcontrast FLAIR. Younger age and ventricular entry warrant surveillance of LM at recurrence, while the overall survival is not as discouraging as expected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39966177What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.