ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2025
Predicting incident cardio-metabolic disease among persons with and without depressive and anxiety disorders: a machine learning approach.
Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating Large-Scale Data Analytics for Cardiovascular Disease Prediction: A Scoping Review.Healthcare informatics research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThere is a global increase of cardiovascular disease and diabetes (Cardio-Metabolic diseases: CMD). Suffering from depression or anxiety disorders increases the probability of developing CMD. In this study we tested a wide array of predictors for the onset of CMD with Machine Learning (ML), evaluating whether adding detailed psychiatric or biological variables increases predictive performance.
methodsWe analysed data from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety, a longitudinal cohort study (N = 2071), using 368 predictors covering 4 domains (demographic, lifestyle & somatic, psychiatric, and biological markers). CMD onset (24% incidence) over a 9-year follow-up was defined using self-reported stroke, heart disease, diabetes with high fasting glucose levels and (antithrombotic, cardiovascular, or diabetes) medication use (ATC codes C01DA, C01-C05A-B, C07-C09A-B, C01DB, B01, A10A-X). Using different ML methods (Logistic regression, Support vector machine, Random forest, and XGBoost) we tested the predictive performance of single domains and domain combinations.
resultsThe classifiers performed similarly, therefore the simplest classifier (Logistic regression) was selected. The Area Under the Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC) achieved by singe domains ranged from 0.569 to 0.649. The combination of demographics, lifestyle & somatic indicators and psychiatric variables performed best (AUC-ROC = 0.669), but did not significantly outperform demographics. Age and hypertension contributed most to prediction; detailed psychiatric variables added relatively little.
conclusionIn this longitudinal study, ML classifiers were not able to accurately predict 9-year CMD onset in a sample enriched of subjects with psychopathology. Detailed psychiatric/biological information did not substantially increase predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.