ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2025
Quantitative perfusion by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging reveals compromised myocardial perfusion in patients with angina with non-obstructive coronary artery disease.
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Value of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, myocardial perfusion index, and global longitudinal strain derived from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in predicting coronary slow flow in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Analysis and Characterization of Factors Affecting the Consistency of Tl-201 Myocardial Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography and Coronary Angiography Results in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionStress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) effectively detects myocardial ischemia. In angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA), visually assessed first-pass perfusion often appears normal. Automated quantitative perfusion (QP) might benefit ANOCA diagnosis, offering absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR).
aimWe aimed to evaluate the efficacy of QP in detecting ANOCA.
methodsThis study compared fully automated QP CMR in ANOCA patients with age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Participants underwent adenosine stress perfusion CMR, including visual assessment and quantification of MBF and MPR. ANOCA patients underwent coronary function testing to identify vasospasm and/or coronary microvascular dysfunction.
resultsTwenty-four ANOCA patients (83% women, 57 ± 9 years) and 25 healthy controls (80% women, 56 ± 7 years) were included. Visual perfusion assessment did not differ between groups (p = 0.54). Additionally, no differences in resting MBF were observed. However, ANOCA patients had significantly lower global MBF during stress (2.43 ± 0.72 vs 2.99 ± 0.65 ml/g/min, p < 0.01) and a significantly lower global MPR (2.24 ± 0.79 vs 2.68 ± 0.64, p = 0.04) compared to healthy controls. MPR was significantly reduced in the RCA territory in ANOCA patients (2.16 ± 0.71 vs 2.69 ± 0.69, p = 0.01), with no significant differences in other coronary territories. MPR did not significantly differ between ANOCA endotypes.
conclusionsANOCA patients display reduced global MPR, suggesting compromised perfusion. Variation in MPR across coronary territories highlights the importance of assessing perfusion in all teritories. These findings are promising and support the use of QP for non-invasive detection of vasomotor dysfunction in ANOCA patients. PRE-REGISTERED CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: The pre-registered clinical trial number is NL-OMON23861.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39966158What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.