ArticleJournal of anesthesia2025
Performance of inflationary oscillometric blood pressure measurement in the presence of atrial fibrillation: comparison to sinus rhythm.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the success rate, measurement duration and the accuracy of inflationary non-invasive blood pressure (iNIBP, Nihon Koden Corp, Tokyo, Japan) during general anesthesia between the subjects with sinus rhythm (SR) and atrial fibrillation (AF) against invasive arterial pressure (IAP).
methodsiNIBP was determined every 5 min and IAP was continuously monitored in 30 subjects with sinus rhythm and 30 subjects with atrial fibrillation. The outcomes of this study were the success rate, the measurement duration of iNIBP and the accuracy of iNIBP in reference to IAP and 5 pair of data from each subject. The accuracy was assessed with concordance correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman method.
resultsThe success rate of iNIBP was 45% and 59% (p < 0.01) with AF and SR, respectively. Measurement duration of iNIBP was not different between AF and SR group. The Lin concordance correlation coefficient of mean blood pressure of iNIBP against IAP of SR group and AF group was 0.83 and 0.77, respectively. The mean bias (SD) of mean blood pressure of iNIBP against IAP of SR group and AF group was 5.8 (8.9) mmHg and 7.1 (11.5) mmHg, respectively. The precision was significantly wider in AF group.
conclusionPresence of AF decreased the incidence of successful determination of blood pressure during cuff inflation. The accuracy of mean blood pressure determination was not considerably affected except for the wider limits of agreement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39966135What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.