ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Is robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy non-inferior to open pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with high PD-ROBOSCORE?
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Does robotic pancreatoduodenectomy reduce the incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a structured narrative review of learning curve, patient selection, and program readiness.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- MyIntuitive telemetry identifies proficiency thresholds in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRobotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is associated with technical challenges that may result in intraoperative and postoperative complications. Some previous reports and the recently published PD-ROBOSCORE describe several factors associated with an increased difficulty. The aim of this study is to investigate whether difficult RPD patients have a better outcome when operated by open approach (OPD).
methodsAll patients undergoing robotic and open PD from January 2020 to June 2024 with high PD-ROBOSCORE were included. Preoperative pancreatitis and/or cholangitis, and tumor contact with PV-SMV were also analysed. Outcomes of RPD vs OPD were compared.
results45 RPD and 57 OPD patients with high PD-ROBOSCORE were considered for this study. Median age was 68.5 years (68 RPD vs 65 OPD; p = 0.25), median BMI was 27 kg/m
conclusionRPD seems to be non-inferior to OPD in patients with increased technical complexity. Most of these complications are related to fistula risk factors (high BMI, soft pancreas and small pancreatic duct) and not directly related with other technical difficulty factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.