ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
Interstitial pregnancy outcomes in correlation with history of ipsilateral tubal surgery: a retrospective study.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of the study is to review the clinical characteristics and risk factors that influence the timing of diagnosis and rupture of interstitial pregnancy, and to evaluate the outcomes of interstitial heterotopic pregnancies after ipsilateral tubal surgery.
methodsA retrospective statistical analysis was performed on the case data of patients with interstitial pregnancy who met the inclusion criteria and were treated in a single institution.
resultsA total of 885 patients with interstitial pregnancy were included in the study, including 55 patients with heterotopic interstitial pregnancies. The gestational age of patients with interstitial rupture was less than those that were diagnosed prior to rupture (P < 0.01). The risk of interstitial pregnancy rupture was higher in women with a history of ipsilateral fallopian tube surgery P < 0.01). In the > 42-day rupture group, the gestation age was less in those with a history of ipsilateral surgery than those without, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.005). The shorter the interval, the higher the risk of interstitial pregnancy rupture (P = 0.001).
conclusionPatients with a history of ipsilateral tubal surgery have a higher risk of interstitial pregnancy rupture. The shorter the interval between ipsilateral tubal surgery and interstitial pregnancy, the higher the risk of rupture. For patients with a combined intrauterine and interstitial pregnancy, timely treatment may improve the chances of achieving term live birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.