Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39966088›Full record

ArticlePest management science2025

Different nontarget-site mechanisms underlie resistance to dicamba and 2,4-D in an Amaranthus tuberculatus population.

Isabel Schlegel Werle, Lucas Kopecky Bobadilla, Damilola A Raiyemo, Alexander J Lopez, Filipi Mesquita Machado, Patrick J Tranel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pest management science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Isabel Schlegel WerleDepartment of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.
Lucas Kopecky BobadillaDepartment of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.
Damilola A RaiyemoDepartment of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6521-2333
Alexander J LopezDepartment of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.
Filipi Mesquita MachadoDepartment of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2113-0907
Patrick J TranelDepartment of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0666-4564

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) Sauer (waterhemp) has emerged as one of several weed species that is resistant to synthetic auxin herbicides (SAHs). Among the mechanisms of resistance to SAHs, nontarget-site resistance (NTSR) has been of particular concern owing to its complexity. Here, we integrated linkage mapping with transcriptome analysis to explore NTSR mechanisms to two SAHs, dicamba and 2,4-D, in a multiple-herbicide-resistant A. tuberculatus population (CHR).

resultsPhenotypic evaluations of an F

conclusionThe results of this study demonstrated that resistance to dicamba and 2,4-D in the CHR population is under the control of genes at multiple loci. The weak phenotypic and genetic associations of resistance traits indicate that more than one NTSR mechanism confers resistance to dicamba and 2,4-D in this A. tuberculatus population. © 2025 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Indexed as

2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic AcidAmaranthusDicambaHerbicide ResistanceHerbicidesChromosome MappingPhenotypeQuantitative Trait Loci2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic AcidDicambaHerbicidesAmaranthus tuberculatusgenetic mappingnontarget‐site herbicide resistancequantitative trait locisynthetic auxin herbicides

Identifiers

PMID39966088
PMCPMC12159393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.