ReviewPaediatric respiratory reviews2025
Narrative review of clinical prediction models for paediatric community acquired pneumonia.
Review in Paediatric respiratory reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differentiated associations of inflammatory indices with laboratory-defined organ injury/involvement and hospitalization length in pediatric respiratory tract infections.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Exploration of the correlation between clinical indicators and prognosis in hospitalized children with pneumonia and construction of a risk prediction model based on machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Unpacking the Unreliability of Interrater Reliability of Pediatric Auscultation.Hospital pediatrics · 2025Article
- Advancing severity grading for risk-differentiated paediatric pneumonia care.The Lancet. Child & adolescent health · 2025Article
- The impact of shared decision making on transitional preparation in children with recurrent pneumonia.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a disease experienced by children the world over, though CAP-related morbidity and mortality differ markedly between low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HICs). Thus, setting-specific clinical prediction models are needed to identify children at risk for CAP-related morbidity and mortality. Here, we outline published clinical prediction models from LMICs and HICs for pediatric CAP-related outcomes. To date, there have been four clinical prediction models to predict treatment failure, two to predict a composite outcome of poor outcomes, and eight models for mortality prediction for CAP in LMICs. No prediction models developed in LMICs had publications that described their impact on clinical care through implementation. In HICs, to date there are three published clinical prediction models evaluating disease severity and one examining the need for major medical interventions. While clinical prediction models described in this review provide a strong foundation for risk stratification for children with CAP in HICs, there is a need for widespread external validation and implementation of optimally performing models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.